Haynes v. Algonquin Nurses, P.R.N., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Haynes v. Algonquin Nurses, P.R.N., Inc.

93 S.W.3d 762, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2200, 2002 WL 31455312

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 5, 2002·No. ED 80780·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clara M. Haynes appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits because she left her employment with Algonquin Nurses, P.R.N., Inc. without good cause attributable to the employer. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Clara M. Haynes appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying her unemployment benefits because she left her employment with Algonquin Nurses, P.R.N., Inc. without good cause attributable to the employer. We find no error and affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Haynes v. Algonquin Nurses, P.R.N., Inc., 93 S.W.3d 762, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2200, 2002 WL 31455312 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

93 S.W.3d 762 (Haynes v. Algonquin Nurses, P.R.N., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.