Haynes, Dorothy M. v. Haynes, Christopher L.
Opinion
DISMISS: Opinion issued October 8, 21)12
in The (nurt tif iirzj1i fift1i Ditrirt nf ixts tt Ot11u No. 05-12-00816-CV
DOROTHY M. HAYNES, Appellant
V. CHRISTOPHER L. HAYNES, Appellec
On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-I 1-15859-G
MEMORANDUM OPINION Befbre Justices O’Neill, FitzGerald, and Lang-Miers Opinion By Justice Lang-Miers
Before the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellee contends the Court should
dismiss the appeal because appellant has failed to comply with notices to pay the filing fee and a docketing
statement.
By letter dated June 18, 2012, the Court informed appellant the $175 filing fee was due. We
cautioned appellant that failure to pay the fee within ten days would result in dismissal of her appeal
without further notice. As of today’s date, appellant has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, we grant
appellee’s motion and dismiss the appeal ee TEx. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
4/ ELLZABETH LANG-MIERS : JUSTICE 120816FP05 niirt uf Appra1 .Fift1! Thitrirt øf Icxw at 1athu
JUDGMENT DOROTKY M. HAYNES. Appellant Appeal from the 134th Judicial 1)istrict Court of Dallas County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. DCi 1- No. 05-12-00816-CV V. 15859-G). Opinion delivered by Justice Lang—Miers. CH R ISTOPHER L. HAYNES, Appel lee Justices O’Neill and FitzGerald, participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDEREI) that appel lee, Christopher L. Haynes, recover his costs of the appeal from appellant, Dorothy M. 1-laynes.
Judgment entered October 8, 2012.
/ 2
4 _ 177 ___, / J / — - — — - —
- EL1ZAETH LANG-MILR J I STIC E ‘V
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haynes, Dorothy M. v. Haynes, Christopher L. (Haynes, Dorothy M. v. Haynes, Christopher L.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.