Hayner v. Burns

370 P.2d 235, 230 Or. 379, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 302
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedApril 4, 1962
StatusPublished

This text of 370 P.2d 235 (Hayner v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayner v. Burns, 370 P.2d 235, 230 Or. 379, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 302 (Or. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In his abstract and brief plaintiff states that this is a proceeding in equity for the dissolution of a partnership and an accounting. It was claimed that plaintiff and defendant Robert Burns formed a partnership to exploit some mining claims in Colorado.

[380]*380At the conclusion of the trial and later by a written opinion, the trial court found a complete lack of any evidence sustaining plaintiff’s claim. We agree with the court. The record is devoid of any evidence to establish a claim of right of any kind in favor of plaintiff against defendants. The facts are of interest only to the parties. They do not justify statement here.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
370 P.2d 235, 230 Or. 379, 1962 Ore. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayner-v-burns-or-1962.