Haymore and Bailey v. Stubbs

Supreme Court of Florida

Haymore and Bailey v. Stubbs

150 So. 262, 112 Fla. 308, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2223

DecidedOctober 12, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 150 So. 262 (Haymore and Bailey v. Stubbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haymore and Bailey v. Stubbs, 150 So. 262, 112 Fla. 308, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2223 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

When a general demurrer is interposed' to a bill filed to foreclose a mortgage, such demurrer is properly overruled if the bill be found to contain any equity. In this case this Court finds from an examination of the transcript of the record that the bill of complaint is' sufficient in substance; therefore, the order appealed from overruling a demurrer to it should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

When a general demurrer is interposed' to a bill filed to foreclose a mortgage, such demurrer is properly overruled if the bill be found to contain any equity. In this case this Court finds from an examination of the transcript of the record that the bill of complaint is' sufficient in substance; therefore, the order appealed from overruling a demurrer to it should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

150 So. 262, 112 Fla. 308, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haymore-and-bailey-v-stubbs-fla-1933.