Haymond v. Friberg, Klein & Co.

1 White & W. 587
Texas Commission of Appeals·Decided April 27, 1881·No. No. 1324, Op. Book No. 2, p. 283·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Quinan, J.

§ 1047. Indorser; before delivery; liability. One who indorses a note before its delivery to the payee thereof, himself not being the payee, is liable thereon as an original promisor or surety, and not as an indorser merely. [Carr v. Rowland, 14 Tex. 275; Cook v. Southwick, 9 Tex. 615.] Such party is not released from liability by failure of the holder of the note to institute suit within the time required by the statute in the case of indorsers, etc.

§ 1048. Receipt; parol evidence admissible to explain, etc. Receipts are informal and non-despositive writings, aud may be modified, explained or impugned by parol. [Whart. on Ev. 1064.]

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Haymond v. Friberg, Klein & Co., 1 White & W. 587 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1881).

1 White & W. 587 (Haymond v. Friberg, Klein & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. Southwick
9 Tex. 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1853)
Carr's Ex'ix v. Rowland
14 Tex. 275 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)