Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA

Fourth Circuit

Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA

472 F. App'x 211

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 30, 2012

DocketNo. 12-1016

StatusPublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 211 (Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA, 472 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leslie A. Haymond appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA, No. 1:11-cv-00800-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[212]*212terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Leslie A. Haymond appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA, No. 1:11-cv-00800-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[212]*212terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

472 F. App'x 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haymond-v-bank-of-new-york-mellon-na-ca4-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack