Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA
472 F. App'x 211
Opinion
Leslie A. Haymond appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA, No. 1:11-cv-00800-AJT-JFA (E.D.Va. Dec. 6, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma[212] terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA, 472 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2012).
472 F. App'x 211 (Haymond v. Bank of New York Mellon, NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983