Haymes v. Haymes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Haymes v. Haymes

266 A.D.2d 58, 698 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11633

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 16, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 58 (Haymes v. Haymes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Haymes v. Haymes, 266 A.D.2d 58, 698 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered April 16, 1999, which denied plaintiffs motion for a partial distribution of marital property, made after entry of a judgment dissolving the marriage but before trial of the equitable distribution claims, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion was properly denied given highly contested issues of fact as to the value of the marital property and plaintiffs financial needs. We would also note that the trial on [59]*59equitable distribution had begun and substantial proceedings had been conducted therein at the time of argument of this appeal. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Lobis, J.), entered April 16, 1999, which denied plaintiffs motion for a partial distribution of marital property, made after entry of a judgment dissolving the marriage but before trial of the equitable distribution claims, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion was properly denied given highly contested issues of fact as to the value of the marital property and plaintiffs financial needs. We would also note that the trial on [59]*59equitable distribution had begun and substantial proceedings had been conducted therein at the time of argument of this appeal. Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Lerner and Andrias, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 58, 698 N.Y.S.2d 851, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11633, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haymes-v-haymes-nyappdiv-1999.