Haymes v. Gray
This text of 2 Wilson 192 (Haymes v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
§ 252. Landlord’s lien; abandonment or waiver of. When a landlord sues to recover rent, and for the enforcement of his lien upon the property of the tenant, which has been seized under a distress warrant, and takes a judgment merely for the rent due, and does not insist upon a foreclosure of his lien in the suit, and there is no foreclosure adjudged, he thereby waives and abandons his lien, and such lien no longer constitutes a right to the property levied on under the distress warrant, and cannot support a claim to the property in a trial'of the [193]*193right of the property. [Wise v. Old, 57 Tex. 514; Toland v. Swearengen, 39 Tex. 447; Johnson v. Murphy, 17 Tex. 216; W. & W. Con. Rep. § 1222.]
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Wilson 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haymes-v-gray-texapp-1884.