Haymes v. Gray

2 Wilson 192
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 11, 1884
DocketNo. 3051
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Wilson 192 (Haymes v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Haymes v. Gray, 2 Wilson 192 (Tex. Ct. App. 1884).

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 252. Landlord’s lien; abandonment or waiver of. When a landlord sues to recover rent, and for the enforcement of his lien upon the property of the tenant, which has been seized under a distress warrant, and takes a judgment merely for the rent due, and does not insist upon a foreclosure of his lien in the suit, and there is no foreclosure adjudged, he thereby waives and abandons his lien, and such lien no longer constitutes a right to the property levied on under the distress warrant, and cannot support a claim to the property in a trial'of the [193]*193right of the property. [Wise v. Old, 57 Tex. 514; Toland v. Swearengen, 39 Tex. 447; Johnson v. Murphy, 17 Tex. 216; W. & W. Con. Rep. § 1222.]

June 11, 1884.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Murphy
17 Tex. 216 (Texas Supreme Court, 1856)
Toland v. Swearingen & Smith
39 Tex. 447 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)
Wise v. Old
57 Tex. 514 (Texas Supreme Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Wilson 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/haymes-v-gray-texapp-1884.