Hayman v. Canton Art Metal Co.

174 A.D. 923, 160 N.Y.S. 42
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 15, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 A.D. 923 (Hayman v. Canton Art Metal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayman v. Canton Art Metal Co., 174 A.D. 923, 160 N.Y.S. 42 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Defendant’s telegraphic offer to sell required its acceptance to be accompanied by certified check for $1,000. Defendant’s offer was withdrawn before plaintiffs had made their acceptance complete by mailing to defendant the required check. This, we think, defendant had the right to do and that there was no completed contract of sale. Defendant’s motion for a nonsuit should have been granted. The judgment and order should be reversed and judgment directed in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint, with costs to defendant in this court and in the court below. All concurred. Judgment and order reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barber-Greene Co. v. M. F. Dollard, Jr., Inc.
239 A.D. 655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 A.D. 923, 160 N.Y.S. 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayman-v-canton-art-metal-co-nyappdiv-1916.