Hayle v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, No. Cv96-0474970s (May 19, 1999)

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5777
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided May 19, 1999·No. No. CV96-0474970S·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

ORDER (re MOTION to REARGUE)
The plaintiffs' motion to reargue the court's ruling (April 20, 1999) on defendants' objection to plaintiffs' motion to amend complaint having been presented, it is hereby Ordered: denied, for the following reason:

The plaintiffs having given notice (April 30, 1999) of their intent to appeal such ruling, it is the court's conclusion that the merits of such ruling should be reserved for decision by the appellate authority which the plaintiffs intend to invoke. Under such circumstances the "strong reasons" on which granting reargument should be predicated are here absent. Ryan v.Fairchild Finance Corp., 14 Conn. L. Rptr. 74 (1995), quoting from Ideal Financing Association v. LaBonte, 120 Conn. 190, 195 (1935).

Gaffney, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayle v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, No. Cv96-0474970s (May 19, 1999), 1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5777 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).

1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 5777 (Hayle v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, No. Cv96-0474970s (May 19, 1999)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ideal Financing Association v. Labonte
180 A. 300 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1935)
Ryan v. Fairchild Finance Corp., No. Cv94 31 53 12 S (Apr. 21, 1995)
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 4168 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1995)