Hayle v. . Cowan

2 N.C. 21
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1793·Published

Opinion

You informed us a while ago, you had a witness summoned who does not attend. These two witnesses not sworn might be intended to counteract his testimony, and your not producing him might be the reason why they were not called upon. We cannot undertake to say they were to prove the same fact the other two were sworn to.

Motion denied.

Cited: Holmes v. Johnson, 33 N.C. 59; See Carpenter v. Taylor,4 N.C. 689. *Page 42

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayle v. . Cowan, 2 N.C. 21 (N.C. Ct. App. 1793).

2 N.C. 21 (Hayle v. . Cowan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carpenter v. . Taylor
4 N.C. 689 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1818)
Holmes v. . Johnson
33 N.C. 55 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1850)