Hayford v. DART

Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 30, 2015·No. 14C-01-024·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY

SHEILA HAYFORD, :

: C.A. No: K14C-01-024 RBY Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

DART and DELAWARE TRANSIT : CORPORATION, :

:

Defendants. :

:

Submitted: July 28, 2015 Decided: July 30, 2015

Upon Consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment MOOT

ORDER

Sheila Hayford, Pro se.

Douglas T. Walsh, Esquire, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, Delaware for Defendants.

Young, J.

Hayford v. Dart, et. al. C.A. No.: K14C-01-024 RBY July 30, 2015

DECISION

Having, on this same day, granted Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this action without prejudice, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is MOOT, and is, therefore, DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Robert B. Young

J.

RBY/lmc oc: Prothonotary cc: Counsel Sheila Hayford Opinion Distribution

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayford v. DART, (Del. Ct. App. 2015).

Hayford v. DART (Hayford v. DART) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.