Hayford v. DART
This text of Hayford v. DART (Hayford v. DART) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
SHEILA HAYFORD, : : C.A. No: K14C-01-024 RBY Plaintiff, : : v. : : DART and DELAWARE TRANSIT : CORPORATION, : : Defendants. : :
Submitted: July 28, 2015 Decided: July 30, 2015
Upon Consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment MOOT
ORDER
Sheila Hayford, Pro se.
Douglas T. Walsh, Esquire, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, Delaware for Defendants.
Young, J. Hayford v. Dart, et. al. C.A. No.: K14C-01-024 RBY July 30, 2015
DECISION Having, on this same day, granted Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this action without prejudice, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is MOOT, and is, therefore, DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Robert B. Young J.
RBY/lmc oc: Prothonotary cc: Counsel Sheila Hayford Opinion Distribution
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hayford v. DART, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayford-v-dart-delsuperct-2015.