Hayford v. DART
Opinion
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR KENT COUNTY
SHEILA HAYFORD, :
: C.A. No: K14C-01-024 RBY Plaintiff, :
:
v. :
:
DART and DELAWARE TRANSIT : CORPORATION, :
:
Defendants. :
:
Submitted: July 28, 2015 Decided: July 30, 2015
Upon Consideration of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment MOOT
ORDER
Sheila Hayford, Pro se.
Douglas T. Walsh, Esquire, Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, Wilmington, Delaware for Defendants.
Young, J.
Hayford v. Dart, et. al. C.A. No.: K14C-01-024 RBY July 30, 2015
DECISION
Having, on this same day, granted Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss this action without prejudice, Defendants’ summary judgment motion is MOOT, and is, therefore, DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Robert B. Young
J.
RBY/lmc oc: Prothonotary cc: Counsel Sheila Hayford Opinion Distribution
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hayford v. DART (Hayford v. DART) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.