Hayes v. Yale New Haven Hospital, No. Cv96-0393656s (Nov. 14, 1997)
This text of 1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11977 (Hayes v. Yale New Haven Hospital, No. Cv96-0393656s (Nov. 14, 1997)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
First and Second Counts
Motion Denied. Under appropriate circumstances the terms of an employment manual may give rise to an express or implied contract. Carbone v. Atlantic Richfield Co.,
Whether by virtue of the defendant's specific manual policy representations recited by the plaintiff the defendant intended to alter the at-will relationship of the parties by express or implied contract is a question of intent and fact beyond the scope of a motion to strike. Centi v. Lexington Health CareCenter, et als, (Super.Ct. J.D. New Haven, D.N. CV96-0383535, May 1, 1997, Licari, J.)
Moreover, as to the defendants' argument concerning CT Page 11978 paragraphs 19 and 20, the plaintiff asserts these paragraphs are not a separate cause of action of wrongful discharge but rather a part of her claim for breach of implied contract. This renders the defendants' argument moot.
Third and Fourth Counts
The plaintiff has withdrawn these counts.
Sixth Count
Motion Granted. The plaintiff has tracked the essential elements necessary for civil fraud and incorporated them into this count. However, deceitful conduct, vis a vis the plaintiff, in the context of this case, does not sufficiently invoke the public policy exception. This exception is a narrow one. In evaluating such claims, the court looks to see whether the plaintiff has alleged that her termination violated any explicit statutory or constitutional provision or any judicially conceived notion of public policy. Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.,
However, the plaintiff has alleged she was terminated for "racial reasons" which reason clearly contravenes an important public policy.
Perhaps Atkins v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.,
Count Eight
Motion Denied. The issue here is whether the plaintiff has sufficiently pled "extreme and outrageous" conduct. The plaintiff CT Page 11979 must allege more than that she was terminated without just cause.Centi, supra. The plaintiff has crossed this threshold by her allegations of fraudulent misconduct. Reasonable minds can differ on whether this allegedly deceitful conduct rises to the necessary level.
Count Nine
Motion Denied. The mere termination of employment, even if wrongful, is not enough to sustain a claim for wrongful termination. Such a claim must be accompanied by additional factual allegations of unreasonable conduct during the termination process or at the time of discharge. Centi, supra. Again, the plaintiff's allegation of fraud supplies the necessary extra ingredient.
Count Ten
The plaintiff has withdrawn this count.
Count Eleven
Motion Denied. The court is persuaded by the reasoning of St.Germaine v. Ensign-Bickford Co., 20 Conn. L. Rptr. No. 7, 232 (November 3, 1997). A direct action for racial discrimination is permissible here.
Licari, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1997 Conn. Super. Ct. 11977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-yale-new-haven-hospital-no-cv96-0393656s-nov-14-1997-connsuperct-1997.