Hayes v. State
This text of Hayes v. State (Hayes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Norman J. Hayes, Respondent,
v.
State of South Carolina, Petitioner.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002294
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Lexington County
Edward W. Miller, Post-Conviction Relief Judge
Opinion No. 27676
Heard October 20, 2016 – Filed November 9, 2016
CERTIORARI DIMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY
GRANTED
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Patrick Lowell Schmeckpeper, both of Columbia, for Petitioner.
Appellate Defender Laura Ruth Baer, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals decision in Hayes v. State, 413 S.C. 553, 777 S.E.2d 6 (Ct. App. 2015). After careful consideration of the appendices and briefs, the writ of certiorari is
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
PLEICONES, C.J., BEATTY, KITTREDGE, HEARN and FEW, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hayes v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-state-sc-2016.