Hayes v. State

1910 OK CR 214, 111 P. 1020, 4 Okla. Crim. 377, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 23, 1910
DocketNo. A-260.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1910 OK CR 214 (Hayes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. State, 1910 OK CR 214, 111 P. 1020, 4 Okla. Crim. 377, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

PEE OTTETAM.

First. The information, in substance, is in the language of the statute, refers to but one and the same transaction, and charges but one offense. The trial court, therefore, did not err in overruling the demurrer to the information.

*378 Second. No exceptions were reserved to the instructions of the court to the jury. We therefore cannot consider the objection now attempted to be made to said instructions. The charge of the court is subject to criticism, but the errors therein contained are not fundamental.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. State
1928 OK CR 128 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1928)
Maddox v. State
1916 OK CR 70 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1916)
Woody v. State
1913 OK CR 300 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1910 OK CR 214, 111 P. 1020, 4 Okla. Crim. 377, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.