Hayes v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Hayes v. State

1910 OK CR 214, 111 P. 1020, 4 Okla. Crim. 377, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided November 23, 1910·No. No. A-260.·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PEE OTTETAM.

First. The information, in substance, is in the language of the statute, refers to but one and the same transaction, and charges but one offense. The trial court, therefore, did not err in overruling the demurrer to the information.

*378 Second. No exceptions were reserved to the instructions of the court to the jury. We therefore cannot consider the objection now attempted to be made to said instructions. The charge of the court is subject to criticism, but the errors therein contained are not fundamental.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE OTTETAM.

First. The information, in substance, is in the language of the statute, refers to but one and the same transaction, and charges but one offense. The trial court, therefore, did not err in overruling the demurrer to the information.

*378 Second. No exceptions were reserved to the instructions of the court to the jury. We therefore cannot consider the objection now attempted to be made to said instructions. The charge of the court is subject to criticism, but the errors therein contained are not fundamental.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

Hayes v. State, 1910 OK CR 214, 111 P. 1020, 4 Okla. Crim. 377, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 103 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

1910 OK CR 214 (Hayes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related