Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hayes v. State

Hayes v. State

96 So. 3d 1047, 2012 WL 3711490, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14499
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hayes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 187 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 2012·No. No. 4D11-3915·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of the defendant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. His claim that the two robbery offenses, to which he pleaded, could not be scored separately on his scoresheet is without merit on its face. The scoring of these separate convictions, even if they did arise from the same criminal episode, is not erroneous and does not violate double jeopardy. § 775.021, Fla. Stat. (2011).

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., GROSS and CIKLIN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. State, 96 So. 3d 1047, 2012 WL 3711490, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14499 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

96 So. 3d 1047 (Hayes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.