Hayes v. State
646 So. 2d 798, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11895, 1994 WL 679314
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 7, 1994·No. No. 93-3823·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Given the facts in the record, we follow the well-established rule that an appeal from a plea of no contest should never be a substitute for a motion to withdraw the plea. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979). Accordingly, we affirm judgment and sentence. See Heatley v. State, 636 So.2d 153, 154 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994), and Isley v. State, 565 So.2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hayes v. State, 646 So. 2d 798, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11895, 1994 WL 679314 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
646 So. 2d 798 (Hayes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
DeLisi v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
646 So. 2d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)