Hayes v. State

566 So. 2d 945, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7148, 1990 WL 135831
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 21, 1990·No. No. 90-01831·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Talmadge Hayes filed a motion for post-conviction relief while his direct appeal to this court was pending and without jurisdiction having been relinquished to the trial court to consider the motion. We affirm the denial of the motion because the trial court was without jurisdiction to consider it. State v. Meneses, 392 So.2d 905 (Fla.1981); Bryan v. State, 470 So.2d 864 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985). Our affirmance is without prejudice to Hayes’ right to file a sufficient motion after disposition of his pending appeal, and the return of jurisdiction to the trial court.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. State, 566 So. 2d 945, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7148, 1990 WL 135831 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

566 So. 2d 945 (Hayes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kit v. State
654 So. 2d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Vara v. State
641 So. 2d 895 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Huff v. State
566 So. 2d 945 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)