Hayes v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Hayes v. State

100 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 680

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 20, 1924

Docket6 Div. 457.

StatusPublished

This text of 100 So. 924 (Hayes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hayes v. State, 100 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 680 (Ala. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the January term, 1923, the grand jury found and returned into open court an indictment against this appellant, charging in count 1 the larceny of one five-passenger Ford automobile, of the value of $500, the personal property of Lueien Thompson. Count 2 charged that he did buy, receive, conceal, etc., said automobile, knowing that it was stolen, and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. He was convicted by the jury under count 2, and was sentenced by the court in conformity to law. He appeals to this court, and the appeal is upon the record only, there being no bill of exceptions. It is the duty of this court to consider all questions apparent, in the record. This we have done, and, finding no errors, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

At the January term, 1923, the grand jury found and returned into open court an indictment against this appellant, charging in count 1 the larceny of one five-passenger Ford automobile, of the value of $500, the personal property of Lueien Thompson. Count 2 charged that he did buy, receive, conceal, etc., said automobile, knowing that it was stolen, and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. He was convicted by the jury under count 2, and was sentenced by the court in conformity to law. He appeals to this court, and the appeal is upon the record only, there being no bill of exceptions. It is the duty of this court to consider all questions apparent, in the record. This we have done, and, finding no errors, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 So. 924, 20 Ala. App. 680, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-state-alactapp-1924.