Hayes v. State
Opinion
At the January term, 1923, the grand jury found and returned into open court an indictment against this appellant, charging in count 1 the larceny of one five-passenger Ford automobile, of the value of $500, the personal property of Lueien Thompson. Count 2 charged that he did buy, receive, conceal, etc., said automobile, knowing that it was stolen, and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. He was convicted by the jury under count 2, and was sentenced by the court in conformity to law. He appeals to this court, and the appeal is upon the record only, there being no bill of exceptions. It is the duty of this court to consider all questions apparent, in the record. This we have done, and, finding no errors, the judgment appealed from is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
100 So. 924 (Hayes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.