Hayes v. Seven Up Bottling Co. of Alexandria

212 So. 2d 450, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 5348
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMarch 27, 1968
DocketNo. 2274
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 212 So. 2d 450 (Hayes v. Seven Up Bottling Co. of Alexandria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Seven Up Bottling Co. of Alexandria, 212 So. 2d 450, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 5348 (La. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinions

SAVOY, Judge.

For the reasons assigned in the case of Walters et al. v. Seven Up Bottling Company of Alexandria, Inc. et al., La.App., 212 So.2d 443, handed down this date, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and judgment is hereby rendered in favor of defendants, Seven Up Bottling Company of Alexandria, Inc. and Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Company of Texas, and against plaintiffs, Ruby Hayes and Curtis Hayes, rejecting their demands and dismissing their suit. Appellees to pay costs in both courts.

Reversed.

FRUGÉ, J., dissents with written reasons assigned. For dissenting opinion see La.App., 212 So.2d 451.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walters v. Seven Up Bottling Co. of Alexandria
212 So. 2d 443 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 So. 2d 450, 1968 La. App. LEXIS 5348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-seven-up-bottling-co-of-alexandria-lactapp-1968.