Hayes v. Sease

27 S.E. 406, 49 S.C. 388, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 162
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 27, 1897
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 27 S.E. 406 (Hayes v. Sease) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Sease, 27 S.E. 406, 49 S.C. 388, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 162 (S.C. 1897).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a motion to reinstate an appeal dismissed by the clerk on the 3d March last. ■ Upon examination of the papers, it appears that no notice of the motion before the clerk to dismiss the appeal for failure to file the “Return” in proper time, was given the adverse party. Rule 1 of this Court provides that ten days notice of such motion shall be given the adverse party, and the provisions of that rule being applicable to [389]*389this case, it was error in the clerk to dismiss the appeal without such notice.

We may add, if it were not that the point just decided settles the question here, this Court would be disposed, under the facts in this case, to favorably consider the motion on the principles announced in Crosswell v. Connecticut Indemnity Association, filed on the 18th instant.

It is, therefore, ordered, that the motion to reinstate the appeal be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Cottingham
77 S.E.2d 897 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 S.E. 406, 49 S.C. 388, 1897 S.C. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-sease-sc-1897.