Hayes v. Savannah Chemical Co.

86 S.E. 1073, 17 Ga. App. 376, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 430
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 20, 1915
Docket6344
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 1073 (Hayes v. Savannah Chemical Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Savannah Chemical Co., 86 S.E. 1073, 17 Ga. App. 376, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 430 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. Where an affidavit of illegality is interposed by the mortgagor to the foreclosure of a mortgage on personal property, the defendant shall execute a replevy bond as provided by section 3301 of the Civil Code of 1910, “conditioned for the return of the property when called for by the levying officer.” Brantley v. Baher, 75 Ga. 676; Shannon v. Vincent, 76 Ga. 837. The bond required by section 3304 of the Civil Code is required where an interested party other than the mortgagor seeks to interpose an illegality, or where under section 3287 of the Civil Code the debtor has placed himself in some one of the positions in which process of attachment could legally issue against him, or where the defendant is disposing or seeking to dispose of the mortgage property and such disposal would lessen the security thereof, and is not required where an affidavit of illegality is interposed by the mortgagor to the foreclosure of a mortgage on personal property, and where the defendant has executed a replevy bond as provided for by section 3301 of the Civil Code of 1910.

2. The bond given in the instant case conformed to the requirements of section 3301, supra, and the trial judge erred in dismissing the affidavit of illegality for the reason that the bond did not contain also the conditions named in section 3304 of the Civil Code.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dawson v. Planters Bank
121 S.E. 242 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Glass v. Austin
111 S.E. 84 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E. 1073, 17 Ga. App. 376, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-savannah-chemical-co-gactapp-1915.