Hayes v. Rogers

15 So. 3d 879, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10595, 2009 WL 2338048
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 31, 2009·No. 5D08-4186·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) (holding that in appellate proceedings, trial court’s decision carries presumption of correctness and appellant has burden to bring forth adequate record to demonstrate error).

MONACO, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Rogers, 15 So. 3d 879, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10595, 2009 WL 2338048 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

15 So. 3d 879 (Hayes v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)