Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Hayes v. Rogers

Hayes v. Rogers

15 So. 3d 879, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10595, 2009 WL 2338048
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 31, 2009
Docket5D08-4186
StatusPublished

This text of 15 So. 3d 879 (Hayes v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Rogers, 15 So. 3d 879, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10595, 2009 WL 2338048 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) (holding that in appellate proceedings, trial court’s decision carries presumption of correctness and appellant has burden to bring forth adequate record to demonstrate error).

MONACO, C.J., PALMER and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 So. 3d 879, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 10595, 2009 WL 2338048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-rogers-fladistctapp-2009.