Hayes v. Phillips

Fourth Circuit

Hayes v. Phillips

603 F. App'x 237

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2015·No. No. 15-6078·Published

Opinion

[238] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Aaron Hayes appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hayes’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Phillips, No. 5:12-ct-03208-D (E.D.N.C. June 10, 2013 & Dec. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[238] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

James Aaron Hayes appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hayes’ motion for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Phillips, No. 5:12-ct-03208-D (E.D.N.C. June 10, 2013 & Dec. 15, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hayes v. Phillips, 603 F. App'x 237 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

603 F. App'x 237 (Hayes v. Phillips) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related