Hayes v. Morrison

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2010·No. 09-2395·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2395

WALTER D. HAYES,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law; PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY; EDWARD E. ROLLINS, JR.; GLADYS HAYES-OWENS; CHARLES EVERETT MALONE, Attorney at Law,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS)

Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Walter D. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Walter D. Hayes appeals the district court’s order

denying reconsideration of the dismissal for lack of

jurisdiction of Hayes’ civil complaint. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

Hayes’ motion to overturn the district court’s decision and

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v.

Morrison, No. 2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Morrison, (4th Cir. 2010).

Hayes v. Morrison (Hayes v. Morrison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.