Hayes v. Lynchburg City School Board ex rel. Barker
This text of 583 F. App'x 270 (Hayes v. Lynchburg City School Board ex rel. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
In this Title VII action alleging racial discrimination, Ralph L. Hayes appeals the district court’s order granting Lynchburg City School Board’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hayes’ motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Lynchburg City Sch. Bd., No. 6:13-cv-00008-NKMRSB, 2014 WL 901213 (W.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2014). We deny as moot the School Board’s motion to quash. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [271]*271presented m the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
583 F. App'x 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-lynchburg-city-school-board-ex-rel-barker-ca4-2014.