Hayes v. Lynchburg City School Board ex rel. Barker

583 F. App'x 270
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 29, 2014·No. No. 14-1328·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In this Title VII action alleging racial discrimination, Ralph L. Hayes appeals the district court’s order granting Lynchburg City School Board’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hayes’ motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Lynchburg City Sch. Bd., No. 6:13-cv-00008-NKMRSB, 2014 WL 901213 (W.D.Va. Mar. 7, 2014). We deny as moot the School Board’s motion to quash. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately [271] presented m the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Lynchburg City School Board ex rel. Barker, 583 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2014).

583 F. App'x 270 (Hayes v. Lynchburg City School Board ex rel. Barker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Powell v. Biscuitville, Inc.
W.D. Virginia, 2020