Hayes v. Livingston

Michigan Supreme Court

Hayes v. Livingston

35 Mich. 371, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 22

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 9, 1877

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 35 Mich. 371 (Hayes v. Livingston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hayes v. Livingston, 35 Mich. 371, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 22 (Mich. 1877).

Pincite

Opinion

Taxation of costs: Stenographer’s transcript. Moneys paid out by plaintiffs in error for a transcript of the stenographer’s minutes of the testimony introduced on the trial, procured for use of his counsel in settling the bill of exceptions, are not taxable as costs in the supreme court against defendant in error.¹

Motion for taxation of costa.

case in chancery may properly be settled with stenographer’s notes when the trial judge goes out of office before the time for settling the case expires: Johnson v. Johnson, 49 Mich., 639. The preparation of bill of exceptions by simply tacking a heading and a conclusion to the stenographer’s notes of the testimony is rebuked: Rice v. Rice, 50 Mich., 448. Stenographer’s are notes, not depositions, and detached portions are not to be used to impeach on subsequent trial, without first interrogating witness as to them • Sdigman v. Ten Eyck, 53 Mich., —.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Taxation of costs: Stenographer’s transcript. Moneys paid out by plaintiffs in error for a transcript of the stenographer’s minutes of the testimony introduced on the trial, procured for use of his counsel in settling the bill of exceptions, are not taxable as costs in the supreme court against defendant in error.¹

Motion for taxation of costa.

case in chancery may properly be settled with stenographer’s notes when the trial judge goes out of office before the time for settling the case expires: Johnson v. Johnson, 49 Mich., 639. The preparation of bill of exceptions by simply tacking a heading and a conclusion to the stenographer’s notes of the testimony is rebuked: Rice v. Rice, 50 Mich., 448. Stenographer’s are notes, not depositions, and detached portions are not to be used to impeach on subsequent trial, without first interrogating witness as to them • Sdigman v. Ten Eyck, 53 Mich., —.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 Mich. 371, 1877 Mich. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-livingston-mich-1877.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack