Hayes v. Langford

773 N.W.2d 707, 485 Mich. 931
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hayes v. Langford. Read the opinion of the Court — 483 Mich. 1125
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided October 26, 2009·No. 138100·Published

Opinion

773 N.W.2d 707 (2009)

Lorraine HAYES, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kimberly LANGFORD, Defendant-Appellant.

Docket No. 138100. COA No. 280049.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

October 26, 2009.

Order

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's July 7, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

CORRIGAN, J, would grant the motion for reconsideration for the reasons set forth in Justice MARKMAN's dissenting statement in this case, 483 Mich. 1125, 767 N.W.2d 436 (2009).

MARKMAN, J, would grant the motion for reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would vacate this Court's order of July 7, 2009, and reverse the *708 Court of Appeals for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in this case, 483 Mich. 1125, 767 N.W.2d 436 (2009).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Langford, 773 N.W.2d 707, 485 Mich. 931 (Mich. 2009).

773 N.W.2d 707 (Hayes v. Langford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. Langford
767 N.W.2d 436 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2009)