Hayes v. Hayes

141 A.D. 35, 125 N.Y.S. 652, 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3799
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hayes v. Hayes. Read the opinion of the Court — 150 A.D. 842

Opinion

Jkxks, J.:

The action is for divorce. The plaintiff moved for a counsel fee ' to - prosecute .an appeal taken, from an. order denying -the motion, for am adjournment,- «“ upon which a, judgment, of.. dismissal .wag, rendered against ” her, and for alimony during .the said appeal,. , The - ■ Special. Term made...an,.order, that allows a counsel fee,.and .the defendant appeals.,, But tlie order of which the. plaintiff complains' hut, .denies, her .ipo,tioR,,:made¡ at.. Special Term for an,-adjournment. S.u.ch an order.’is, not appealable. (Nichols, N. Y. Pr. 3634 and references.) •,It may,he. that the. plaintiff. has,, a, grievance,,.but .she '• has- mistaken .the practice,, and is not entitled., to, .an allowance ..to enable.her ito:purs.n.e.her erroneous course. ■ , ..

The order must be reversed, and the. motion, must be denied. ,

Hirsohbeeg, P. J.j Woodward, Burr and Thomas, JJ., concurred,

Order reversed and motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Hayes, 141 A.D. 35, 125 N.Y.S. 652, 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3799 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

141 A.D. 35 (Hayes v. Hayes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.