Hayes v. Hayes

8 La. Ann. 468
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedSeptember 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 8 La. Ann. 468 (Hayes v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Hayes, 8 La. Ann. 468 (La. 1852).

Opinion

Slidell, J.

The exception pleaded by the defendant and which vims overruled by the Court below, involves the proposition that a man may lawfully agree with another to limit his responsibility in damages for a future offence against such person’s good name. Such a doctrine is as inadmissible as it is novel. It is manifestly inconsistent with public policy that a man should he permitted to stipulate a partial impunity for the commission of a future immoral act.

Such being our opinion, it is unnecessary to inquire whether the motion to dismiss the appeal, upon the ground that the judgment was not final, was well made.

Judgment affirpied, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hymel v. Eagle, Inc.
7 So. 3d 1249 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2009)
Conoco, Inc. v. MEDIC SYSTEMS, INC.
107 F. Supp. 2d 725 (W.D. Louisiana, 2000)
Elmer v. Coplin
485 So. 2d 171 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1986)
Battig v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
482 F. Supp. 338 (W.D. Louisiana, 1977)
Reeves v. Louisiana and Arkansas Railway Company
282 So. 2d 503 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)
Plantation Pipe Line Co. v. Kaiser Alum. & Chem. Corp.
222 So. 2d 905 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
Succession of Oliver
1 La. App. 526 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
Bowman v. Phillips
41 Kan. 364 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 La. Ann. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-hayes-la-1852.