Hayes v. Hatchell
166 So. 2d 146
Opinion
John HAYES, Jr., and Willie Mae Hayes, his wife, Petitioners,
v.
C.W. HATCHELL and Helen Hatchell, his wife, Respondents.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Mahoney, Hadlow, Chambers & Adams and Gerald Bard Tjoflat, Jacksonville, for petitioners.
John Paul Howard, Jacksonville, for respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The decision of the District Court of Appeal, 157 So.2d 855, in this cause is quashed and the cause is remanded for disposition consistent with the decision of this Court in City of Miami, Florida et al., petitioner v. Smith, respondent, 165 So.2d 748, filed June 24, 1964.
DREW, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL, O'CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hayes v. Hatchell, 166 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 1964).
166 So. 2d 146 (Hayes v. Hatchell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Webber v. Jordan
366 So. 2d 51 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Tejon v. Broome
261 So. 2d 197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Short v. Grossman
245 So. 2d 217 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1971)
Grossman v. Short
235 So. 2d 11 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Anastasio v. Summersett
217 So. 2d 854 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Brick v. Denny
205 So. 2d 549 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Roberts v. Bushore
182 So. 2d 401 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1966)
Roberts v. Bushore
172 So. 2d 853 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)