Hayes v. Haj
246 A.D. 568
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The last two paragraphs of the statement of facts in the respondents’ brief deleted. We note a growing tendency to include in briefs matter extraneous to the record. Including such matter is of course improper and sometimes, as in this case, reprehensible. All concur. (The judgment affirms a judgment of the Buffalo City Court dismissing the complaint in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hayes v. Haj, 246 A.D. 568 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).
246 A.D. 568 (Hayes v. Haj) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Niagara County Water District v. Board of Assessors
31 A.D.2d 1004 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1969)
Padilla v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
29 A.D.2d 495 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1968)
In re the Estate of Chambers
167 Misc. 843 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)