Hayes v. Haj
This text of 246 A.D. 568 (Hayes v. Haj) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs. The last two paragraphs of the statement of facts in the respondents’ brief deleted. We note a growing tendency to include in briefs matter extraneous to the record. Including such matter is of course improper and sometimes, as in this case, reprehensible. All concur. (The judgment affirms a judgment of the Buffalo City Court dismissing the complaint in an automobile negligence action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Edgcomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-haj-nyappdiv-1935.