Hayes v. Guardianship of Thompson
This text of 934 So. 2d 493 (Hayes v. Guardianship of Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
William F. HAYES, Jr., et al., Appellants,
v.
In re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Mae E. THOMPSON, etc., Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Rosenthal Rosenthal Rasco, Eduardo I. Rasco, and Jessica B. Lassman, for appellants.
Stephen B. Fuller, for appellee.
Before LEVY, SHEPHERD, and CORTIÑAS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
We find that the appellants lack standing to challenge the trial court's award of attorney's fees. McGinnis v. Kanevsky, 564 So.2d 1141, 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Accordingly, we affirm and certify conflict with Bachinger v. Sunbank/South Florida, N.A., 675 So.2d 186 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
934 So. 2d 493, 2005 WL 602912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-guardianship-of-thompson-fladistctapp-2005.