Hayes v. Gorham

3 Ill. 429
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1840
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Ill. 429 (Hayes v. Gorham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Gorham, 3 Ill. 429 (Ill. 1840).

Opinion

Smith, Justice,

delivered the opinion of the Court:

We are of opinion that the Circuit Court erred in sustaining the demurrer of the plaintiffs to the second plea of the defendant.

The facts set forth in the plea would be a good bar to the action, if proven, and consequently the plea should have been sustained.

The Court, we think, erred in admitting the testimony of the witness, H. N. Schooler; he was interested in having a previous assignor sued, and the money collected of him, as that would discharge his liability.

Let the judgment be reversed with costs, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ill. 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-gorham-ill-1840.