Hayes v. Gemma Power System, LLC

Fourth Circuit

Hayes v. Gemma Power System, LLC

78 F. App'x 302

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2003·No. No. 03-1522·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Herbert Hayes appeals the district court’s orders granting Respondents’ motion for summary judgment in his employment discrimination action and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hayes v. Gemma Power Sys., L.L.C., No. CA-01-312-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2003 & Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [303] materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Herbert Hayes appeals the district court’s orders granting Respondents’ motion for summary judgment in his employment discrimination action and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hayes v. Gemma Power Sys., L.L.C., No. CA-01-312-5-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 19, 2003 & Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the [303] materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Hayes v. Gemma Power System, LLC, 78 F. App'x 302 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

78 F. App'x 302 (Hayes v. Gemma Power System, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related