Hayes v. Claessens

202 A.D. 762
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

All concur, except Kiley, J., dissenting, with an opinion; Hinman, J., not sitting. The court disapproves of findings of fact numbered eighth, eleventh and twelfth, and of the facts found in conclusions of law numbered two and three; and finds the facts requested to be found in defendant’s requests to find numbered twelfth, thirteenth, fifteenth, seventeenth, eighteenth, nineteenth, twenty-second and twenty-fourth.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Claessens, 202 A.D. 762 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

202 A.D. 762 (Hayes v. Claessens) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Havens v. Havens
126 Misc. 155 (New York Supreme Court, 1925)