Hayes v. Chao

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 31, 2005
• Docket: 05-1049
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1049

VICTOR HAYES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ELAINE CHAO, Secretary, United States Department of Labor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03- 3591-RWT)

Submitted: March 24, 2005 Decided: March 31, 2005

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Kristine L. Sendek Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Victor Hayes appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his employment discrimination complaint for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Hayes v. Chao, No. CA-03-3591-

RWT (D. Md. filed Sept. 20, 2004 & entered Sept. 21, 2004). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -