Hayes v. Califano

438 F. Supp. 1113, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13814
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedSeptember 26, 1977
DocketNo. 77-214C(B)
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 438 F. Supp. 1113 (Hayes v. Califano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Califano, 438 F. Supp. 1113, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13814 (E.D. Mo. 1977).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

REGAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Bennie L. Hayes commenced this action for judicial review of the decision of the defendant, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare denying disability insurance benefits which plaintiff claimed under Section 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 423. The action is before the Court upon the cross-motions of the parties for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ. Pro. 56. The matter has been submitted upon the administrative record and memoranda of law filed by the parties.

On September 8, 1975 plaintiff applied for disability insurance benefits alleging that she became disabled on June 1,1973 on account of a back condition. The application was denied after initial consideration, reconsideration, and a hearing held before an administrative law judge on September 29, 1976. On October 28, 1976 the administrative law judge ruled against plaintiff and on December 30, 1976 the Appeals [1114]*1114Council of the Social Security Administration affirmed. Thereafter this action was timely commenced.

In his decision the administrative law judge stated as follows:

At the time of the alleged onset date claimant had physical illness. There are objective medical findings in this case which establish the existence of illness and medical disorder * [* Residuals of two strokes and the aforementioned back condition.] to which claimant attributes disability. Claimant can sit, walk, stand, move about and lift light objects. Claimant’s medical evidence reveals good muscular development, good limb and back motion. Claimant has good vision. Claimant lost several short periods of time from work for evaluation and treatment. Said medical disorder responds well to treatment. Claimant is usually asymptomatic when proper diet and regimen are observed. Claimant has previous work experience in light and moderately light work. Claimant’s illness and impairment present a mild handicap in the performance of job duties. The evidence fails to show that claimant has been precluded from substantial gainful activity by physical or mental impairment. Claimant’s medical condition was discovered before the alleged onset date. Thereafter, claimant worked regularly and successfully until the commencement of the period in question herein, wherein claimant alleges inability to engage in substantial gainful activity. The mere presence of an illness or impairment is not per se proof of disability. This claimant has failed to prove severe functional impairment and disability lasting a continuous 12 month period.

(Tr. 12-13). The administrative law judge also made the following specific findings:

2. Claimant has suffered from illness and impairment which lasted 12 full months, which resulted in a mild handicap in work, but which has not been of such severity as to preclude substantial gainful activity for 12 full months.
3. At all times herein relevant claimant had sufficient capacity, education, training and health to engage in significant functions and substantial gainful activity in previous work.
4. At all times herein relevant claimant retained sufficient residual capacity to perform the duties of light jobs which exist in significant numbers considering claimant’s age, education, work experience, subjective complaints and the objective medical findings herein.

(Tr. 13). He determined ultimately that plaintiff was not disabled under the Social Security Act.1

Judicial review of this decision is limited to whether or not it is supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole and whether or not the decision comports with the rules of law. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Russell v. Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, 540 F.2d 353 (8th Cir. 1976).

[1115]*1115Plaintiff was born January 9, 1936. She now resides in St. Charles, Missouri.

From October 2 to October 8, 1971 plaintiff was hospitalized for headaches of an undetermined origin. The primary diagnosis was cerebral dysrythmia and migraine headache. Plaintiff had been previously complaining of blurred vision. An electroencephalogram indicated abnormal paroxsysmal dysrythmia consistent with an epileptic pattern. (Tr. 216).

From March 13 to March 18, 1973 plaintiff was hospitalized for pain in both feet. The discharge diagnoses were (1) intractable keratoma, plantar, second metatarsal head, bilateral; (2) intermetatarsal neuromata [4], 2nd and 3rd intermetatarsal spaces, bilateral; (3) onycocryptosis, medial and lateral hallux, left foot. (Tr. 207). After examining plaintiff Dr. George Fralick, M.D. reported

Nothing remarkable except she tends to have some intolerance to rich foods and occasional nausea. No palpitations. Occasional chest pain. No chronic or asthma. She states she has had occasional shortness of breath.

(Tr. 194). While hospitalized plaintiff underwent surgery on her feet. Plaintiff was discharged in satisfactory condition and given a post-operative instruction sheet and instructions to call for prescriptions and an appointment.

Plaintiff was seen at the Friendly Hills Medical Group in LaHabra, California, from July 1973 to September 1974. Plaintiff complained variously of fatigue, some low back pain, abdominal cramping and laryngitis, tension or migraine headaches, cervical or neck sprain, and uterine bleeding. She also experienced flushing and bruising which was attributed to low hormone level. On September 5, 1973 plaintiff was hospitalized for nausea, vomiting, and lower abdominal pain. The final diagnosis was dehydration due to nausea and vomiting, and acute cystitis. She was discharged on September 6 in an improved condition. (Tr. 150).

On June 28, 1974 plaintiff underwent a vaginal hysterectomy. Plaintiff had previously experienced heavy vaginal bleeding. Plaintiff’s condition on discharge on July 5, 1974 was good.

On October 1,1974 plaintiff was hospitalized for severe and refractory back pain. Dr. Harold Cohen, M.D., reported the history of the present illness as follows:

The patient has had progressive back pain, becoming very severe recently, and having a very gradual onset perhaps since June, the patient dating it to a time shortly after she had a vaginal hysterectomy in 1974, but more specifically from travelling extensively, having lived previously in LaHabre. She gave a history of having had a “bad disc” in the past. When she was seen on the 17th she had inability to sit, and had left leg radiation of the pain. Weight was 111#. Blood pressure was normal. U.A. was normal. CBC was normal. Lumbosacral spine films and pelvic exams were normal for acute pathology . . . . On 9-27 she was somewhat better, but she was still unable to sit. Because of this arthritic screen was done. At this time the rheumatoid arthritis test was positive. The C-reactive protein was positive . She continued to do extremely bad; on 9- 30-74 had very severe pain, and on 10- 1 was still quite ill and hospitalization was necessary.

(Tr. 79). Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hayes v. Califano
582 F.2d 1287 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
438 F. Supp. 1113, 1977 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-califano-moed-1977.