Hayes v. Buzzell

60 Me. 205
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1872
StatusPublished

This text of 60 Me. 205 (Hayes v. Buzzell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Buzzell, 60 Me. 205 (Me. 1872).

Opinion

Dickerson, J.

Without considering the other alleged infirmities in the defense, we think that the omission of the officer to give notice of the several adjournments of the sale is fatal. Failing to comply with the requirements of R. S., c. 84, §§ 4, 5, the officer became a trespasser ah initio.

Judgment for plaintiff, for $76.75.

Appleton,' C. J.; Cutting, Walton, and Daneokth, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Me. 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-buzzell-me-1872.