Home/Supreme Judicial Court of Maine/Hayes v. Buzzell

Hayes v. Buzzell

60 Me. 205
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1872·Published

Opinion

Dickerson, J.

Without considering the other alleged infirmities in the defense, we think that the omission of the officer to give notice of the several adjournments of the sale is fatal. Failing to comply with the requirements of R. S., c. 84, §§ 4, 5, the officer became a trespasser ah initio.

Judgment for plaintiff, for $76.75.

Appleton,' C. J.; Cutting, Walton, and Daneokth, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Buzzell, 60 Me. 205 (Me. 1872).

60 Me. 205 (Hayes v. Buzzell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.