Hayes v. Burton & Sue, L.L.P.
This text of Hayes v. Burton & Sue, L.L.P. (Hayes v. Burton & Sue, L.L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2051
HERBERT HAYES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BURTON & SUE, L.L.P.; GARY K. SUE; TEAGUE, ROTENSTREICH, STANALAND, FOX & HOLT; JEREMY A. KOSIN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-00391-NCT-PTS)
Submitted: April 28, 2011 Decided: May 2, 2011
Before DAVIS, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Herbert Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Walter K. Burton, BURTON & SUE, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina; Paul Anthony Daniels, TEAGUE, ROTENSTREICH, STANALAND, FOX & HOLT, LLP, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Herbert Hayes appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Burton & Sue,
LLP, No. 1:09-cv-00391-NCT-PTS (M.D.N.C. Sept. 1, 2010). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hayes v. Burton & Sue, L.L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-burton-sue-llp-ca4-2011.