Hayes v. Bureau of Indian Affairs

63 F. App'x 720
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 22, 2003·No. No. 03-1405·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Hayes appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint seeking reparations for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Hayes v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, No. CA-03-498-AMD (D.Md. Mar. 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Bureau of Indian Affairs, 63 F. App'x 720 (4th Cir. 2003).

63 F. App'x 720 (Hayes v. Bureau of Indian Affairs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pulliam v. United States
540 U.S. 921 (Supreme Court, 2003)