Hayes v. Board of Election
This text of Hayes v. Board of Election (Hayes v. Board of Election) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1793
ROBERT HAYES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
BOARD OF ELECTION FOR BALTIMORE CITY; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-05-1699-1-AMD)
Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 22, 2005
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Hayes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert Hayes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his civil complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Hayes v. Bd. of
Election, No. CA-05-1699-1-AMD (D. Md. filed July 7, 2005 & entered
July 8, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Hayes v. Board of Election, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-board-of-election-ca4-2005.