Hayes v. Bickford

503 A.2d 1297, 1986 Me. LEXIS 695
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedFebruary 4, 1986
StatusPublished

This text of 503 A.2d 1297 (Hayes v. Bickford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayes v. Bickford, 503 A.2d 1297, 1986 Me. LEXIS 695 (Me. 1986).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.

Defendant Frank Bickford appeals from an order of the Superior Court (York County) granting a preliminary injunction. The order prohibits any excavation or removal of gravel, minerals, or trees from certain premises owned by Mr. and Mrs. Hayes and leased to Bickford.

A preliminary injunction is an interlocutory order that has as its purpose the maintenance of the status quo pending a final determination of the parties’ rights. See Town of Kittery v. White, 415 A.2d 1087, 1088 n. 1 (Me.1980); 2 Field, McKu[1298]*1298sick & Wroth, Maine Civil Practice § 65.-2(2) (2d ed. 1970). Because it is an interlocutory order, a preliminary injunction is not appealable unless it falls within a recognized exception to the final judgment rule. Connors v. International Harvester Co., 437 A.2d 880, 881 (Me.1981). Our review of the record reveals that the preliminary injunction entered in this case does not fall within any such exception.

The entry is:

Appeal dismissed.

All concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Connors v. International Harvester Company
437 A.2d 880 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1981)
Town of Kittery v. White
415 A.2d 1087 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
503 A.2d 1297, 1986 Me. LEXIS 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-bickford-me-1986.