Hayes v. Bayley

4 Cow. 143
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hayes v. Bayley. Read the opinion of the Court — 4 Cow. 42
New York Supreme Court·Decided February 15, 1825·Published

Opinion

Curia.

We said ,in Alcott et al. v. Phelps, that the plaintiff might charge for all necessary services, on a recovery of less than $250, at the Common Pleas rate, and we allowed o. -nisiprius record; butthere is no rate established in that Court for a counsel fee. It by no-means follows from .this, that the plaintiff is entitled to its allowance, and that top .ait the Supreme Court rate. It is a service entirely unknpjvn to the Common Pleas, and to which there is no rate in that Court applicable. The counsel fee must be stricken out.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes v. Bayley, 4 Cow. 143 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1825).

4 Cow. 143 (Hayes v. Bayley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.