Hayes L. Watt v. United States Postal Service

36 F.3d 1112, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 22713, 1994 WL 513619
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 12, 1994·No. 94-3495·Unpublished

Opinion

36 F.3d 1112

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Hayes L. WATT, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 94-3495.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Aug. 12, 1994.

63 M.S.P.R. 290.

DISMISSED.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayes L. Watt v. United States Postal Service, 36 F.3d 1112, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 22713, 1994 WL 513619 (Fed. Cir. 1994).

36 F.3d 1112 (Hayes L. Watt v. United States Postal Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related