Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hayduk v. Mahoney Motor Sales, Inc.

Hayduk v. Mahoney Motor Sales, Inc.

17 A.D.2d 715, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8422
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedAugust 29, 1962
StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 715 (Hayduk v. Mahoney Motor Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hayduk v. Mahoney Motor Sales, Inc., 17 A.D.2d 715, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

Motion by appellant to amend nunc pro turne its notice of appeal, dated June 15, 1962, so as to read that the appeal is from a judgment of the City Court of Yonkers to this court, instead of to the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court as now specified in the notice. Motion denied, without prejudice to an application for such amendment to the City Court of Yonkers or to the Appellate Term (Civ. Prac. Act, § 107; cf. Kalish v. Belmont Motors, 280 App. Div. 824). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kalish v. Belmont Motors, Inc.
280 A.D. 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 A.D.2d 715, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayduk-v-mahoney-motor-sales-inc-nyappdiv-1962.