Haydon v. State
755 So. 2d 785, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4421, 2000 WL 378156
Opinions
This is an appeal from a sentence in a robbery case where the judge erred in enhancing the penalty. Because the specific factors that allow for an enhancement were not present in the jury’s verdict and because a conviction on one count of an information may not be used to enhance punishment for a conviction on another count, it was error to give the greater penalty. See McKinnon v. State, 540 So.2d 111 (Fla.1989).
SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Haydon v. State, 755 So. 2d 785, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4421, 2000 WL 378156 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
755 So. 2d 785 (Haydon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. McKinnon
540 So. 2d 111 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Jenkins v. State
747 So. 2d 997 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)