Hayden v. Strong
30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 527
This text of 30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 527 (Hayden v. Strong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hayden v. Strong, 30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 527 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1881).
Opinion
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered in the County Court of Onondaga county, costs to abide event. Held, that the charge of the judge, in effect, that the words “ without recourse ” must be written in such a manner that they could be read by a man “ of ordinary ability and • understanding ” in order to exonerate the indorser, was erroneous.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
30 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayden-v-strong-nysupct-1881.