Hayden v. State
This text of 450 So. 2d 1242 (Hayden v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We adopt the rationale of Miller v. State, 438 So.2d 83 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983) and hold that for the purpose of the reclassification statute,1 which enhances a felony by one degree where a firearm is used, a defendant charged with murder by use of a firearm is also charged with lesser included felonies of the murder charge. We accordingly reject both Smith v. State, 445 So.2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) and Carroll v. State, 412 So.2d 972 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) which hold that the reclassification statute has no application where a defendant is not convicted of the felony specified in the charging document but is instead convicted of committing with a firearm any lesser included offense.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
450 So. 2d 1242, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 13932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayden-v-state-fladistctapp-1984.