Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hayden v. Newmark

Hayden v. Newmark

279 A.D. 940, 111 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5377
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 1952·Published

Opinion

In our opinion the complaint is insufficient. (Amend v. Hurley, 293 N. Y. 587; Dambmann v. Schulting, 75 N. Y. 55.) Plaintiffs may plead over, if so advised, within ten days from the date of the entry of the order hereon. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hayden v. Newmark, 279 A.D. 940, 111 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

279 A.D. 940 (Hayden v. Newmark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dambmann v. . Schulting
75 N.Y. 55 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Amend v. Hurley
59 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)