Hayden v. Newmark
279 A.D. 940, 111 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5377
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1952
StatusPublished
This text of 279 A.D. 940 (Hayden v. Newmark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hayden v. Newmark, 279 A.D. 940, 111 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
Opinion
In our opinion the complaint is insufficient. (Amend v. Hurley, 293 N. Y. 587; Dambmann v. Schulting, 75 N. Y. 55.) Plaintiffs may plead over, if so advised, within ten days from the date of the entry of the order hereon. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dambmann v. . Schulting
75 N.Y. 55 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Amend v. Hurley
59 N.E.2d 416 (New York Court of Appeals, 1944)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 940, 111 N.Y.S.2d 219, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayden-v-newmark-nyappdiv-1952.